Open Message to Mayor Watson and City Council,
Attached is a copy of a letter hand-delivered to Minister Chan as well as to the press gallery at Queen’s Park. The provincial leader of the NDP rose in the Ontario Legislature to call attention to it.
As you read this letter, ask yourself whether this is indicative of the quality of decision making that the people of Ottawa expect from all of you. On what expert authority is the decision to ignore important archaeological potential being based?
- It isn’t the expertise of licensed archaeologists – the city has NONE on staff and none were contracted by the city to review the situation. The two licensed experts who did review the new evidence have called for a new study.
- It isn’t the Ministry of Tourism and Culture who have clearly stated that they only review reports presented to them and that they have downloaded the approval authority to the city when it comes to requiring new studies. Only the City as the approval authority, or the Minister of Culture acting on an emergency basis, can order that a new study be done.
- It isn’t the City Council’s advisory committee on Arts and Heritage that has unanimously recommended that a new study be done.
- It isn’t the people whose direct heritage is being ignored. ALL the Algonquin First Nations on both sides of the Ottawa River have expressed their concern and requested that a new review be done. Furthermore the City Council’s new advisory subcommittee on Aboriginal Affairs has also unanimously recommended that a new study be done.
The answer according to the Mayor is that the decision has been made by a non-professional archaeologist (J. Moser) based on a legal opinion city counsel (T. Marc) – neither of whom have any training or expertise in archaeology. This is the same legal counsel who recently stood against public interest groups at an OMB hearing and challenged the affidavits presented by the public because they were submitted by non-professionals in the subjects being reviewed!
Is this the quality of decision making that City Council wants to rely on? Decisions made by those apparently blind to their consequences because they are untrained to evaluate the information required to make the right decision?
The legal opinion only confirms that it is apparently legal in Ontario to embarrass the City and its leadership by relying on an out-dated study when it comes to development approvals. Doesn’t say much for the quality of legislation used to protect cultural heritage. It is equally legal to require that a new study be done at any time prior to registration of subdivision.
The City Council of Ottawa does not have to rely on a decision-making process that is blind to the facts. Nor should Council allow the City to be embarrassed by decisions made by staff in such a flawed manner.
South March Highlands – Carp River Conservation Inc.