On Sept 9, 2004 while he was Leader of the Opposition, Harper wrote to the Governor General and requested that, should the minority Liberal government fall, before calling an election that the GG grant him and the Bloq the opportunity to form a Coalition Government!
September 9, 2004 Her Excellency the Right Honourable Adrienne Clarkson, C.C., C.M.M., C.O.M., C.D. Governor General Rideau Hall 1 Sussex Drive Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A1 Excellency, As leaders of the opposition parties, we are well aware that, given the Liberal minority government, you could be asked by the Prime Minister to dissolve the 38th Parliament at any time should the House of Commons fail to support some part of the government’s program. We respectfully point out that the opposition parties, who together constitute a majority in the House, have been in close consultation. We believe that, should a request for dissolution arise this should give you cause, as constitutional practice has determined, to consult the opposition leaders and consider all of your options before exercising your constitutional authority. Your attention to this matter is appreciated. Sincerely, Hon. Stephen Harper, P.C., M.P. Leader of the Opposition Leader of the Conservative Party of Canada Gilles Duceppe, M.P. Leader of the Bloc Quebecois Jack Layton, M.P. Leader of the New Democratic Party
So why was a coalition government good enough for Harper then but suddently is an undemocratic thing to do now? … could it be that it is because he is a self-serving liar who would divide this country and cause a political crisis just so he can cling to power??
Nearly 2/3 of Canadians actually voted against Harper’s government in the last election.
In fact, 170,000 FEWER Conservatives voted for him.
Yet due to the lack of proportional representation in the House of Commons he managed to obtain 20 more seats – yet still has a minority of the seats.
So why should he be allowed to prorogue Parliament and govern like a King without opposition?
Stephen Harper’s lies about the Coalition are getting more and more divisive.
He lied when he said “Here we have these three parties signing a document, and they wouldn’t even have a the Canadian flag behind them! They had to be photographed without it, because a member of the coalition doesn’t even believe in the country.”
He lied when he said that it includes the Separatists in the Coalition. In fact, the Coalition is between the NDP and the Liberals with the support of the BQ and the Green Party.
He lied when he said that it is something that he would never work with the BQ. In fact, he relied on the BQ to bail him out in 40 non-confidence votes during the last 2 years.
He lied when he used a different speech in English than in French on Dec 4 referring to “separatists” in the highly provocative English speech while cowardly using the term “souverainiste” in the French speech 5 minutes later. Harper knows full well the difference in the two terms when used in French in Quebec.
Separatist has a distinctly negative connotation that focuses on the division of Canada, while sovereigntist has a postitive connotation that focuses on promoting independence without necessarily damaging Canada. As in Sovereignty-Association.
He lied when he claimed that his economic statement contained new initiatives to support the economy. In fact all he did was summarize intiatives already announced in prior budgets. There was nothing new other than an attack on pay equity for women.
Finally he lied when he said that our oldest democratic traditions dating back 141 years were based on electing a government. In fact our parliamentary tradition was started by a coalition government in the 1860s and is based on electing members to the House of Commons who are responsible for forming a government based on a majority of members. Our country has subsequently had several coalition governments both federally and provincially.
The real question is how can Harper claim that proroguing Parliament is a democratic act?